Friday, December 7, 2012

Journalism and the Silver Screen: Final Project JCOM 1500


I. The movie Network was released in November of 1976. It starts off with the introduction of Howard Beale, a newscaster from the UBS television network talking with his boss Max Schumacher about how he is being fired for having low ratings. The next thing we see is Beale giving a newscast announcing he will be killing himself the next Tuesday. UBS goes into a frenzy trying to recover from Beale’s crazy ranting. Diana Christensen from the programming division sees Howard as a gold mine for ratings and shares. They create the Howard Beale Show with Beale “denouncing the hypocrisies of [their] times.”[i] Meanwhile, Diana is creating another show based on a terrorist group filming their acts of terrorism. Beale is a hit, until he announces that the CCA (owners of UBS) were making a deal with Arabs and tells the American people to revolt against the deal. The owner of CCA, Mr. Jensen, approaches Beale and gives a speech about how there is no America or democracy, only money and business, and he convinces Howard that that is what he must tell the audience. Because of Beale’s change in opinions, his ratings drop and the company has to decide what to do with him. A group of leaders from the company come to the conclusion they will have him assassinated by the terrorist group they are doing another show on and having that be the opening episode for the new season. Network ends with a somber segment of them deciding to kill Beale and cutting to the actual event of him being assassinated live.
Right after it was released a review in The New York Times said, “Network can be faulted for going too far and not far enough, but it’s also something that very few commercial films are these days. It’s alive. This, I suspect, is the Lumet drive. It’s also the wit of performers like Mr. Finch, Mr. Holden, and Miss Dunway. As the crazy prophet within the film says of himself, Network is vivid and flashing. It’s connected into life.”[ii] Another review from that same year said, “… [It] seems to be telling us is that television itself is like…An economic process in the blind pursuit of ratings and technical precision, in which excellence is as accidental as banality.”[iii]


II. There are many media ethical dilemmas in this movie. At least these five: 1) “Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity”; 2) “Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility”; 3) “Avoid misleading re-enactments or staged news events. If re-enactment is necessary to tell a story, label it”; 4) “Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information except when traditional open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of the story”; and 5) “Examine your own cultural values and avoid imposing those values on others.”[iv]
These are shown in many ways. 1) They were willing to put Howard Beale on air spouting his anger and rage because it was giving them ratings and “he [was] articulating the popular rage.” 2, 3, and 4 were all shown through the making of the show based on the terrorist group. They were getting the video clips through surreptitious methods; the video was given to a third party who gave it to them to avoid associating with criminals. Also, Diana came right out and said they would add drama behind the short, real clips of the terrorist acts. The network was “getting around the FBI by doing the show in collaboration with the news division.”[v] Finally ethical issue 5) Mr. Jensen fed Howard Beale his corporate mindset of no America or democracy, only businesses. He was imposing those ideas on Beale who in turn imposed them on the audience. In fact, the Howard Beale show from the beginning was imposing Beale’s opinions on anyone who would listen.

III. In my lecture I will be hitting on the ethical issues discussed above as well as how the culture of the time biased how the journalists were framed in the movie, what media effects theories were portrayed, the view from the movie on the role and impact of journalists in society which is very closely related to the media effects theories. Also I had a few things from the movie that stood out to me that I will talk about such as how ratings were more important than the well-being of human beings and even criminal acts. Finally I will look at how (or if) the ethical issues were resolved.

IV. Journalists were framed in two separate categories, the older and younger generations. A good example of the first is the character Max Schumacher who cared about his friend Howard Beale’s well-being and sanity and didn’t want him to be allowed to rant like a madman on live television. He also believed in good quality, ethical newscasts with the truth being the only choice in what was aired. On the other hand was Diana Christensen, a young workaholic whose main focus was ratings, shares, and popularity. She saw television as show business and was ok with blurring the lines and creating shows instead of news. The ethical dilemmas are framed mostly by the younger generation of journalists crating new shows based only on what would be a hit.

V. The consequences of the journalists’ actions were extreme. Howard Beale created a mass following that would have done anything he told them. In the film he gave a speech where he told people to get mad at the world and what was going on around them, at everything. He told them to open their windows and yell, “I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore!” Also after the CCA deal with the Arabs was known Beale announced it and told everyone to write telegrams to the White House telling them to stop the deal and the public did, the White House was flooded with telegrams about the deal. The consequences of the network’s actions were a little harder to see. One final consequence is that because of what they created with Beale, they saw the only way out of the Howard Beale show was to kill him, an innocent man died because of their obsessions with ratings and publicity.
VI. The culture of the time is explained well with Dependency Theory. This greatly influenced how the journalists were framed. When this film was released in 1976 television was already the most popular and influential mass medium. Audiences were becoming increasingly dependent on what they saw on TV. The journalists in the movie were very aware that audiences were aware and depending on what they heard and saw and would take anything on the TV set as truth. Audiences were “dependent on media (a) to understand the social world; (b) to act meaningfully and effectively in society; and (c) to find fantasy and escape or diversion.”[vi]
VII. In conclusion the film Network was a satirical but realistic rendition of television in 1976. Many ethical dilemmas were portrayed including imposing cultural ideas on the masses and associating with those who would damage integrity and credibility. The journalists were portrayed in mostly a negative, ratings-driven light which emphasized the lack of ethics when creating the new shows. The culture at the time created a bias with how the journalists were shown, and the media effect theory of Dependency was a major theme; it was what the Howard Beale show was founded on.

VII. Quiz Questions
  1. How were the journalists portrayed?
    A) As cold, hard newscasters bring the truth to the American people.
    B) As greedy, rating minded businessmen who saw TV as show business.
    C) All of the above.
  2. What media effects theory is shown?
    A) Magic Bullet
    B) Dependency Theory
    C) All of the above.
  3. What are some of the ethical issues that were challenged?
    A) Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
    B) Examine your own cultural values and avoid imposing them on others
    C) All of the above.
  4. What was the mentality of Mr. Jensen?
    A) America and democracy are alive
    B) The only nations in the world were businesses.
    C) All of the above.
  5. What ethical issue did Mr. Jensen incorporate into the Beale show?
    A) Imposing his cultural values on others.
    B) Plagiarizing.
    C) All of the above.
True or False?
  1. Agenda setting theory was portrayed in the movie. False
  2. The culture of the time was one where TV was very much a mass medium. True
  3. The ethics issues were resolved. False
  4. Howard Beale was killed to help another show have a “sensational season opener.” True
  5.  One of the ethics issues challenged was to never plagiarize. False





[i]  Chayefsky, Paddy, "Network," Written by Paddy Chayefsky, November 1976, DVD.
[ii] Canby, Vincent. "Chayefsky’s 'Network' Bites Hard As a Film Satire of TV Industry." New York Times, November 15, 1976.
[iii] Ebert, Roger. "Network." Chicago Sun-Times, January 01, 1976. rogerebert.suntimes.com (accessed December 1, 2012).
[iv] Chicago Headline Club Chapter of Society for Professional Journalists, "Ethics Advice Line for Journalists." Accessed December 4, 2012. http://www.ethicsadvicelineforjournalists.org.
[v] Chayefsky, Paddy, "Network," Written by Paddy Chayefsky, November 1976, DVD.
[vi] Stanley J. Baran, Introduction to Mass Communication Media Literacy and Culture, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012), 368-370.



No comments:

Post a Comment